首页> 外文OA文献 >Integrating molecular epidemiology and social network analysis to study infectious diseases: towards a socio-molecular era for public health
【2h】

Integrating molecular epidemiology and social network analysis to study infectious diseases: towards a socio-molecular era for public health

机译:整合分子流行病学和社会网络分析以研究传染病:迈向公共健康的社会分子时代

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The number of public health applications for molecular epidemiology and social network analysis has increased rapidly since the improvement in computational capacities and the development of new sequencing techniques. Currently, molecular epidemiology methods are used in a variety of settings: from infectious disease surveillance systems to the description of disease transmission pathways. The latter are of great epidemiological importance as they let us describe how a virus spreads in a community, make predictions for the further epidemic developments, and plan preventive interventions. Social network methods are used to understand how infections spread through communities and what the risk factors for this are, as well as in improved contact tracing and message-dissemination interventions. Research is needed on how to combine molecular and social network data as both include essential, but not fully sufficient information on infection transmission pathways. The main differences between the two data sources are that, firstly, social network data include uninfected individuals unlike the molecular data sampled only from infected network members. Thus, social network data include more detailed picture of a network and can improve inferences made from molecular data. Secondly, network data refer to the current state and interactions within the social network, while molecular data refer to the time points when transmissions happened, which might have happened years before the sampling date. As of today, there have been attempts to combine and compare the data obtained from the two sources. Even though there is no consensus on whether and how social and genetic data complement each other, this research might significantly improve our understanding of how viruses spread through communities.
机译:自从计算能力的提高和新测序技术的发展以来,用于分子流行病学和社会网络分析的公共卫生应用程序的数量迅速增加。当前,分子流行病学方法用于各种场合:从传染病监测系统到疾病传播途径的描述。后者具有重要的流行病学意义,因为它们可以让我们描述病毒如何在社区中传播,为流行病的进一步发展做出预测并计划预防性干预措施。社交网络方法用于了解感染如何通过社区传播,以及这种感染的危险因素是什么,以及用于改进的联系人跟踪和消息传播干预措施。需要研究如何结合分子和社交网络数据,因为两者都包含有关感染传播途径的基本信息,但还不够充分。两种数据源之间的主要区别在于,首先,社交网络数据包括未感染的个人,这与仅从受感染的网络成员中采样的分子数据不同。因此,社交网络数据包括网络的更详细图片,并且可以改善从分子数据得出的推论。其次,网络数据是指社交网络中的当前状态和交互作用,而分子数据是指发生传输的时间点,这可能是在采样日期之前的几年发生的。截止到今天,已经尝试合并和比较从两个来源获得的数据。尽管在社会数据和遗传数据是否互补以及如何互补方面尚无共识,但这项研究可能会极大地增进我们对病毒如何通过社区传播的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号